This is not about a ghastly triple murder in South Africa. It is about the political model called “socialism” that a distressing percentage of our countrymen are prepared to shove down our throats and other orifii.
On 26 July, three people were kidnapped from their farm in Magogong , just outside Hartswater in the Northern Cape, South Africa. An elderly couple and their daughter were, according to a facebook page, “Namibia Uncovered II,” savagely mutilated, tortured, and left to die. (A person claiming to be the sister of either the male or female victim wrote a furious comment saying the sensational, blood-and-guts stuff was all lies.)
At any rate, the commentary and phrasing in the SA People News provides a stunningly frank insight into the moral standards of a nation dominated by socialists. Here is the link to the article:
First, consider the implication of this statement: “Our justice system must send out a strong message that there is no place in our democracy for such callous and inhumane acts.” The writer calls on the justice system, rather than on the people, to “…send out a strong message that there is no place in our democracy for such…acts.” So they are going to stop such bloodthirsty, wanton butchery by telling the butchers that’s not the way we do things here? What does the form of government have to do with it? “In our democracy?” Would such acts be more acceptable in a plutocracy? Or in a dictatorship of the Anointed Ones? “Send out a strong message?” How about sending out a bullet? Or a noose?
This, right here, is the most eloquent, exquisite, perfect illustration of William James’ and John Dewey’s ethics of Pragmatism: There is no right or wrong – we can’t say what they did was actually morally wrong – it’s just that we don’t want them to do those things.
I was personally scolded by a female manager at Intel Corporation’s Rio Rancho, NM factory, for saying killing people and eating them was as hideous a moral outrage as one could imagine. She said, “We don’t use phrases like moral outrage. We just say that’s not the way we do things here. There is no right or wrong; there is only different.”
In that sentence from the SA People News there is no condemnation of murder. There is no statement of the sanctity of life. There is no affirmation of every human being’s right to live. There is only the politically and morally craven (That’s tonight’s term for “chickenshit.”) genuflection to “our democracy.” Even the acts, themselves, are not monstrous, barbaric, morally depraved, or evil. No, they are “…callous and inhumane…” that’s all. Not wrong, just different.
A few sentences later, the SA People News says, “We have repeatedly condemned attacks on farms and farmers as acts of gross criminality that is detrimental to the social cohesion that our young democracy needs. A month ago we launched a 16-point plan to focus on rural attacks on farms and small holdings, which have seen the terrible murders of farmers, farm workers, their wives, parents and children, as well as visitors to farms.”
Do you see that? Murder and butchery is not evil or an affront to God Almighty. No, it is “…detrimental to the social cohesion…” Your mom and dad don’t mean squat except as covalent bonds in the social molecule.
And yet socialists the world over condemn, with the most dripping, corrosive vituperations that it is Capitalism that denies the worth of the individual human beings. I don’t know about you, but I’d damned sure rather be thought worth $12.50 an hour than seen as the glue bonding some professor’s utopian wet dream. That paragraph goes on to bemoan these terrible murders that apparently just randomly, totally eradicate all life on the unlucky farms, so the author bloody well knows what’s happening, but the socialistic (and politically correct) model of life he’s been programmed with won’t let him say the words, “Feloniously inappropriate!” (That’s tonight’s phrase for “Bloody fucking WRONG!”)
And, it seems that the American Democrat Party, which has denied the existence of Antifa, the violence of riots, and even the existence of riots in America, has had a hand in writing scripts for the socialists in the South African government, as well. They have apparently convinced the president of South Africa his best game is to deny any murders of farmers, viz the following: “This is exactly the sort of attack the DA has been insisting the Government take seriously, despite the President claiming that no farmers are being killed in South Africa.” (The “DA” is the Democratic Alliance, the chief party of opposition to the radically socialist – and coincidentally bloody – African National Congress.)
One might suffer sudden-onset epiphany about the moral fortitude of a society that can mount no more ferocious opposition to the dehumanizing, casual cannibalism of socialism than a party (the DA) whose leader described their ideal thus, “We believe the state has a crucial role to play in socio-economic development. We are not free market fundamentalists. By the same token we do not believe that a state, with limited capacity, should over-reach itself.”
So the poor sods in South Africa are trying to survive socialism by injecting themselves with socialism in hope of developing antibodies. But wait! There’s more!
In pressuring the government to take some sort of action against the apparent war on farms – again cut and pasted from SA People News –
“Speaker of the National Assembly, Thandi Modise…says farm attacks and murders must be taken as seriously as gender-based violence (GBV), and highly trained specialized units must patrol and prevent these attacks before they occur.” (Triple emphasis not in the original. That’s my own editorializing.)
Farmers, farm workers, and their families, who work 24/7 to put food on our tables, also have the right to live and work in safety,” she said.”
Man! Didn’t flat lay the law down on those who randomly rob and murder entire families! My gosh! She said multiple kidnappings, torture, and murder are every bit as serious as gender-based violence! Man! Then she said how important it is to protect these luckless farmers because they have a right to be safe as they fulfill their obligation to feed the rest of us! That’s about as utopian socialist as you can get! The farmers don’t have a right, as human beings, to live, or to defend themselves from barbaric animals. They only have a “right” – term used bloody loosely – within the context of their value to society.
Can you control your giddy, dancing anticipation of having the government justify your existence in terms of your servitude? Aren’t you foaming at the mouth to live in a nation where multiple homicides are considered as heinous as gender-based violence?
I’m sure the person who wrote that article had no idea some unreconstructed old White male Boomer was going to dissect his socialistic hand-wringing over the threat to the social cohesion of Utopia. In fact, I’d be astonished if the possibility of something like that even occurred to him, and that is a further measure of the intellectual default necessary for a person to accept the premises of socialism.
.
Wess Rodgers – rebsarge.wordpress.com – Albuquerque